Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advances in genetic engineering have transformed cancer immunotherapy, enabling the development of T-cell–based and antibody-based strategies that target intracellular neoantigens. In particular, TCR-engineered T cells and TCR-mimic antibodies recognizing peptide–MHC complexes have expanded the range of targetable tumor antigens beyond surface proteins. This Perspective outlines a conceptual framework in which three interacting but context-dependent biological axes–T-cell memory differentiation, tumor microenvironment (TME) regulation, and control of alloreactivity–collectively determine therapeutic efficacy and safety. While T-cell memory and TME-mediated suppression broadly influence the persistence and function of engineered T-cells, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) represents a distinct challenge restricted to allogeneic settings. Emerging evidence highlights the importance of memory T-cell subsets, particularly stem-like and central memory populations, in sustaining long-term antitumor immunity. However, their function is frequently constrained by immunosuppressive cellular networks and metabolic barriers within the TME, including regulatory T cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. In parallel, advances in graft engineering and T-cell receptor editing provide strategies to mitigate alloreactivity while preserving graft-versus-tumor effects. By integrating these dimensions, this Perspective emphasizes the need for coordinated therapeutic strategies that balance durability, immune tolerance, and microenvironmental adaptation. A deeper mechanistic understanding of these interactions will be critical for the rational design of next-generation immunotherapies targeting intracellular tumor antigens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Böldicke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: