Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a patient-centered outcome in pediatric burn care, yet no burn-specific, validated German-language instrument is available for this population. This study evaluated the feasibility and measurement properties of the German PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales (GCS) in pediatric outpatients after thermal injuries. Methodology In this retrospective observational study, the authorized German PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS was implemented in a pediatric burn clinic. Data from October 2022 to January 2026 were analyzed across 16 age-, respondent-, and recall-specific forms. Feasibility, internal consistency (model-based omega total), structural validity (ordinal confirmatory factor analysis of parent-proxy reports), floor and ceiling effects, known-groups validity, and responsiveness were assessed. Patients were the unit of analysis; analysis windows (0–30 and ≥ 31 days after the patient-specific index) were distinct from questionnaire recall versions. Results Of 1,194 questionnaire opportunities, 951 (79.6%) were completed; language barriers accounted for 42.0% of non-completions. Parent-proxy and child self-report index samples comprised 382 and 134 patients. The parent-proxy Total Score averaged 80.73, with Emotional functioning the lowest (73.61). Of 96 form-by-scale coefficients, 75 were estimated; Emotional functioning point estimates exceeded 0.70 in all forms, although precision was frequently limited, whereas the Total Score was estimable in seven forms (0.814–0.945), and Physical, Social, and Cognitive/School values below 0.70 occurred only in 8–12-year or adolescent forms. No model achieved adequate global fit (correlated four-factor model, n = 244: CFI = 0.865; RMSEA = 0.120). Ceiling effects reached 55.2% for Social and 42.0% for Cognitive/School functioning, without relevant floor effects. Known-groups differences were confined to parent-proxy Physical Summary (adjusted p = 0.030; δ = −0.238). In 122 paired patients, Total and Physical Summary Scores increased by 4.98 (95% CI 2.80–7.16) and 6.63 (3.45–9.82) points, with no consistent evidence of Social improvement. Conclusions The German PedsQL™ 4.0 GCS was feasible for routine use and showed generally adequate internal consistency in several larger form-by-scale analyses. Group-level monitoring requires attention to form, domain, sample size, and structural-fit limitations. Structural validity was only partially supported and examined in parent-proxy reports alone; content validity and invariance were not evaluated. Ceiling effects require cautious interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiller et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: