Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Amoxicillin (AMX) is widely released into natural ecosystems, posing serious environmental and health concerns. This study aims to evaluate three raw, base-/acid-activated, and calcined clay-rich materials (AM, HJ1, and HJ2), sampled from the Maknessy-Mazzouna basin (central Tunisia), to remove AMX from water. The clay-rich materials were analyzed in detail using several computational techniques to understand the AMX adsorption processes and the molecular interactions with the various minerals present in these clay-based adsorbents. Acid-treatment enhanced the adsorbent’s BET surface, thereby raising the removal yield, since the acid-activated samples constantly exhibited the highest adsorption capacities, particularly HJ1 (HJ1+HCl), which achieved a maximum adsorption of 98.7% when 1000 µmol L −1 AMX were added, and with a mean desorption rate of 0.6%. Furthermore, HJ1+HCl exhibited the best regeneration performance (adsorption always above 95%), highlighting its superior efficiency as an AMX adsorbent compared to the remaining samples. Conversely, base treatment was less effective than acid activation in enhancing adsorption performance, yet base-treated adsorbent samples exhibited higher overall AMX retention (45.4–94.2%), irrespective of adsorbent type or initial antibiotic concentration, compared with raw (33.8–82.9%) and calcined samples (27.2–84.5%). Generally, the weaker adsorption capacities of the calcined clay-rich materials compared to the raw and acid-/base-activated ones are possibly due to their lower porosity. Overall, the results underscore the efficacy of the studied Tunisian clay-rich materials as eco-friendly adsorbents for antibiotic removal and environmental preservation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamdi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: