Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Ab-interno canaloplasty (ABiC), a trabecular outflow-enhancing minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). However, evidence on optimal use-cases and surgical/post-surgical protocols is limited. This study explores expert opinions on best practices in ABiC.Research design and methods A modified Delphi method (Round 1: web-based, Round 2: face-to-face, Round 3: web-based) generated consensus on indications, surgical protocol, postoperative management, and expected outcomes from a national panel of 6 glaucoma surgeons experienced with ABiC using iTrack (Nova Eye Medical). Consensus was predefined as minimum two-thirds of the panelists selecting ‘Strongly Agree/Agree’ for Round 3 Likert-scale statements.Results All statements achieved consensus in Round 3 (100% response rate). Expert opinion was that ABiC is ideal in mild–moderate and stable severe OAG; effective with/without concomitant phacoemulsification; typically performed circumferentially with 100–148 µL of pressurized viscoelastic delivery; followed routinely with antibiotic and steroid drops; associated with transient complications like hyphema and IOP spikes; expected to demonstrate efficacy up to 5 years; and amenable to subsequent MIGS/invasive surgery.Conclusions This exploratory consensus study represents an initial effort toward formulating best practices in ABiC. Delphi studies with large, diverse panels are required to establish robustly generalizable practice guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Camejo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: