Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We live in a time where artificial intelligence-related futurism abounds and in which predictive technologies have real effects. I take up philosopher Carissa Véliz's critique of prophecy and prediction – as expressions of power and means of control – to ask how Christian ethics should respond to this challenge. Drawing on Ellen Davis and Sarah Musser's account of biblical prophecy, I canvas three responses: (1) eschewing prophecy for the sake of ethics, (2) redefining prophecy as social criticism, and (3) construing prophecy as interpretation. Each contributes something essential, but I find that Christian ethics cannot do without alternative imaginations of the future, not least because of the need to contest technological determinisms. Sketching a theological ‘anti-inevitabilism’, I explore how the prophetic task aims to foster agency. Yet the prophetic task doesn’t exhaust Christian ethics’ vocation in a technological age, and the final section places it alongside two others: the pastoral and the prudential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel Tranter (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: