Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article addresses the societal costs associated with the lack of regulation in artificial intelligence and proposes a framework combining innovation and regulation. Over 50 years of AI research, catalysed by declining computing costs and the proliferation of data, have propelled AI into the mainstream, promising significant economic benefits. Yet, this rapid adoption underscores risks, from bias amplification and labour disruptions to existential threats posed by autonomous systems. The discourse is polarised between 'accelerationists', advocating for unfettered technological advancement, and 'doomers', calling for a slowdown to prevent dystopian outcomes. This piece advocates for a middle path that leverages technical innovation and smart regulation to maximise AI's potential benefits while minimising its risks, offering a pragmatic approach to the responsible progress of AI technology. Technical invention beyond today's most capable foundation models is needed to contain catastrophic risks. Regulation is required to create incentives for this research while addressing current issues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carv�ão et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: