Key result
The 12-lead ECG-AI model detected HFpEF with an AUC of 0.760 in HeartShare and independently predicted incident HFpEF up to 4 years prior to diagnosis.
Why the study?
HFpEF accounts for over half of US heart failure cases and remains a diagnostic challenge requiring non-invasive, scalable screening tools. This study evaluated the external performance, temporal reproducibility, and early detection capability of an ECG-AI model for identifying HFpEF.
Does an electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) model accurately and reproducibly detect heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predict preclinical HFpEF up to 4 years before clinical diagnosis?
Cohort (n=12,770)
Yes
Does an electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) model accurately and reproducibly detect heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and predict preclinical HFpEF up to 4 years before clinical diagnosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An AI model applied to 12-lead or single-lead (lead I) ECGs demonstrates reproducible detection of HFpEF and can identify HFpEF risk up to 4 years prior to clinical diagnosis, supporting its potential for scalable screening and remote monitoring.
Background Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over half of all heart failure cases in the United States and remains a diagnostic challenge. Non-invasive, scalable screening tools may enable earlier recognition, timely intervention, and improved care. To evaluate the performance, reproducibility, and early detection capability of an electrocardiogram-based artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) model designed to identify HFpEF using HeartShare data and real-world ECGs from Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH). Methods The original ECG-AI model was developed and validated using >1 million ECGs. In this study, we examined the external validity and reproducibility over time of this ECG-AI measure in 432 participants from an NIH-funded study of clinically validated HFpEF or controls (HeartShare). Specifically, we assessed model accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values) and reproducibility across three serial ECGs. We also analyzed the potential for early (preclinical) detection of HFpEF in 59,705 real-world ECGs from 12,338 patients a large integrated healthcare system (Wake Forest Baptist Health (WFBH)). Results In HeartShare, ECG-AI achieved an AUC of 0.760 (95% CI: 0.729-0.816), with 65% sensitivity and 75% specificity for detection of HFpEF. We obtained no significantly different AUC when using only lead I ECG as an input, AUC of 0.773 (0.729-0.816). Within-patient reproducibility across three consecutive ECGs showed strong correlations (Pearson r = 0.87-0.89) and strong agreement (Cohen’s κ = 0.68-0.74). Misclassified cases showed fewer risk factors and more normal-like ECG features. In real-world WFBH data, ECG-AI detected HFpEF up to 4 years before clinical diagnosis with AUCs from 0.77 to 0.80. Conclusions 12 lead ECG-AI model demonstrates strong generalizability, reproducibility and early detection capabilities for HFpEF, supporting its potential as a scalable screening and risk stratification tool. Almost identical single lead AUC demands future investigation for remote monitoring. What is new? This study is the first to demonstrate that an ECG-AI model for HFpEF maintains strong temporal reproducibility across serial ECGs, supporting its stability as a robust non-invasive tool. We validate the model in both a rigorously phenotyped cohort and a large real-world health system and show that single-lead ECG input achieves accuracy comparable to the full 12-lead model. In addition, we show that the model can identify HFpEF years before clinical diagnosis, extending prior work by establishing ECG-AI as a reproducible, generalizable, and potentially preclinical detection tool. What are the clinical implications? The strong temporal reproducibility of the ECG-AI measure indicates that it can provide reliable longitudinal tracking of HFpEF risk, making it suitable for both clinical monitoring and remote assessment. Early detection capabilities - up to four years before diagnosis - create opportunities for proactive evaluation and earlier intervention. The comparable performance of single-lead ECGs also opens the door for scalable deployment through wearable or home-based devices, broadening access to HFpEF screening and enabling continuous risk surveillance outside traditional clinical environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karabayir et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) (n=12,770). Wake Forest ECG-AI risk score for HFpEF detection vs. Clinically validated HFpEF diagnosis and lower ECG-AI risk strata was evaluated on Incident HFpEF diagnosis associated with ECG-AI risk strata (and HFpEF detection AUC in HeartShare) (HR 2.40, 95% CI 2.23-2.58, p=<0.005). The 12-lead ECG-AI model detected HFpEF with an AUC of 0.760 in HeartShare and independently predicted incident HFpEF up to 4 years prior to diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: