Key result
Genetic variants may alter DOAC pharmacokinetics, but prospective trials are needed before clinical adoption.
Why the study?
Clinically important inter-individual variability in DOAC exposure, efficacy, and safety persists despite predictable pharmacokinetics and simplified dosing compared with warfarin. Pharmacogenomics can help explain this variability and advance precision anticoagulation.
Do genetic variants in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters influence the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants?
Do genetic variants in drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters influence the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While genetic variants in CES1, CYP3A4/5, ABCB1, and ABCG2 influence DOAC pharmacokinetics, prospective genotype-guided trials and multiethnic validation are required before routine clinical implementation.
INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer predictable pharmacokinetics and simplified dosing compared with warfarin, yet clinically important inter-individual variability in drug exposure, efficacy and safety persists. Pharmacogenomics can help explain this variability and advance precision anticoagulation. AREAS COVERED: This narrative review synthesizes evidence on genetic determinants of the pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, identified by searching PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from inception to May 2026. Evidence from candidate-gene studies, genome-wide association studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses was synthesized and the magnitude of reported genetic effects were compared the non-genetic determinants of exposure. Variants in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CES1, ABCB1 and ABCG2 have been investigated for their potential effects on DOAC disposition and response. CES1 variants, particularly rs2244613, rs8192935 and rs71647871, may influence dabigatran exposure, while transporter variants may affect absorption and elimination. CYP3A4/5 and ABCG2 variation has also been associated with altered rivaroxaban and apixaban pharmacokinetics. Evidence for edoxaban, including SLCO1B1 variation, remains limited. EXPERT OPINION: Pharmacogenomics represents a promising component of individualized DOAC therapy, but routine clinical implementation is in progress. Prospective genotype-guided studies, validated polygenic and clinical-genetic scores, therapeutic concentration thresholds and diverse multiethnic validation are needed before pharmacogenomic testing can reliably inform DOAC selection and dosing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratan et al. (2026) conducted a review in Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban). Genetic variants in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CES1, ABCB1, ABCG2, and SLCO1B1 vs. Non-genetic determinants of DOAC exposure was evaluated on Pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants. Genetic variants in CES1, CYP3A4/5, ABCB1, and ABCG2 may alter DOAC pharmacokinetics and response, though prospective genotype-guided studies are needed for clinical implementation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: