Key result
Low stroke volume index after AMI with preserved LVEF is linked to ~65% higher 30-day mortality.
Why the study?
LVEF guides risk assessment after AMI, but preserved LVEF does not ensure preserved forward flow, prompting evaluation of the relationship between stroke volume index and 30-day mortality in AMI patients with preserved LVEF.
Does low Doppler-derived stroke volume index (<35 mL/m2) predict higher 30-day mortality compared to normal flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%)?
Cohort (n=2,142)
Does low Doppler-derived stroke volume index (<35 mL/m2) predict higher 30-day mortality compared to normal flow in patients with acute myocardial infarction and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%)?
Low Doppler-derived stroke volume index (<35 mL/m2) identifies a higher-risk phenotype among AMI patients with preserved LVEF, though it offers minimal incremental prognostic discrimination once acute clinical severity (shock, arrest, hemodynamic support) is accounted for.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-flow phenotype signals elevated risk in AMI despite preserved LVEF; leaves open incremental value beyond shock and support.
Purpose Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) guides risk assessment after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but preserved LVEF does not ensure preserved forward flow. We examined stroke volume index (SVI) and 30‐day mortality after AMI with preserved LVEF. Methods Adults with a first AMI‐coded hospitalization and echocardiography from 24 h before through 48 h after admission were identified in MIMIC‐IV and MIMIC‐IV‐Echo. Documented type 2 myocardial infarction was excluded. SVI was calculated from left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) diameter, velocity‐time integral (VTI), and body surface area (BSA). Preserved LVEF was ≥50%; low flow was SVI <35 mL/m 2 . Modified Poisson regression estimated risk ratios (RRs); splines assessed nonlinearity. Results Among 4,307 patients, 2,142 had preserved LVEF; 864 (40.3%) had low flow. Thirty‐day mortality was 7.5% (65/864) with low flow and 4.7% (60/1,278) with normal flow. The adjusted RR was 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.19–2.29), but joint adjustment for shock and pre‐echocardiography support yielded RR 1.31 (0.95–1.82). The association was nonlinear ( P < 0.001). Spline‐modeled SVI increased the C‐statistic by 0.0147 (bootstrap 95% CI, 0.0051–0.0290) beyond clinical variables and LVEF; after adding shock, cardiac arrest, and support to the base model, the increase was 0.0024 (−0.0012–0.0097). Conclusion Low Doppler‐derived SVI identified a higher‐risk preserved‐LVEF phenotype, but its incremental discrimination was minimal after acute‐severity information was included. The finding supports descriptive hemodynamic phenotyping rather than an AMI treatment threshold and requires external validation against Killip class and established risk scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) (n=2,142). Low forward flow (stroke volume index <35 mL/m2) vs. Normal forward flow (stroke volume index ≥35 mL/m2) was evaluated on 30-day mortality (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.19-2.29). Low stroke volume index after AMI with preserved LVEF was associated with higher 30-day mortality vs normal flow.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: