Key result
Cardiosphere-derived cells reduce post-MI scar size by ~9 percentage points vs routine care.
Why the study?
Cardiosphere-derived cells showed regenerative effects at 6 months in the CADUCEUS trial, but complete results, detailed magnetic resonance imaging analysis, and determinants of efficacy at the final 1-year endpoint were unknown.
Does intracoronary administration of autologous cardiosphere-derived cells safely reduce scar size and increase viable myocardium at 1 year in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction?
RCT (n=25)
Blinded core laboratory observer for MRI analysis (no placebo control group)
2:1 ratio
Yes
Does intracoronary administration of autologous cardiosphere-derived cells safely reduce scar size and increase viable myocardium at 1 year in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Final 1-year results of the phase 1 CADUCEUS trial demonstrate that intracoronary autologous cardiosphere-derived cell therapy post-MI is safe and produces sustained reductions in scar mass alongside increases in viable myocardial mass and regional contractility, though global LVEF was unchanged.
Objectives This study sought to report full 1-year results, detailed magnetic resonance imaging analysis, and determinants of efficacy in the prospective, randomized, controlled CADUCEUS (CArdiosphere-Derived aUtologous stem CElls to reverse ventricUlar dySfunction) trial. Background Cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) exerted regenerative effects at 6 months in the CADUCEUS trial. Complete results at the final 1-year endpoint are unknown. Methods Autologous CDCs (12.5 to 25 × 106) grown from endomyocardial biopsy specimens were infused via the intracoronary route in 17 patients with left ventricular dysfunction 1.5 to 3 months after myocardial infarction (MI) (plus 1 infused off-protocol 14 months post-MI). Eight patients were followed as routine-care control patients. Results In 13.4 months of follow-up, safety endpoints were equivalent between groups. At 1 year, magnetic resonance imaging revealed that CDC-treated patients had smaller scar size compared with control patients. Scar mass decreased and viable mass increased in CDC-treated patients but not in control patients. The single patient infused 14 months post-MI responded similarly. CDC therapy led to improved regional function of infarcted segments compared with control patients. Scar shrinkage correlated with an increase in viability and with improvement in regional function. Scar reduction correlated with baseline scar size but not with a history of temporally remote MI or time from MI to infusion. The changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in CDC-treated subjects were consistent with the natural relationship between scar size and ejection fraction post-MI. Conclusions Intracoronary administration of autologous CDCs did not raise significant safety concerns. Preliminary indications of bioactivity include decreased scar size, increased viable myocardium, and improved regional function of infarcted myocardium at 1 year post-treatment. These results, which are consistent with therapeutic regeneration, merit further investigation in future trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malliaras et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Convalescent myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction (n=25). Intracoronary autologous cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) vs. Routine standard care alone was evaluated on Safety endpoints (serious adverse events within 12 months of infusion) and exploratory 1-year MRI scar size reduction (p=0.36). Intracoronary autologous cardiosphere-derived cells were safe and reduced scar size at 1 year compared to routine care post-MI.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: