Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Financial institutions and payment platforms now process transaction volumes that routinely exceed the practical capacity of rule-based compliance monitoring. This paper develops a conceptual framework for embedding artificial intelligence into compliance monitoring and anomaly detection within high-volume transaction environments. Drawing on literature spanning anti-money laundering supervision, fraud detection, graph-based machine learning, federated learning, concept drift adaptation, and financial model risk governance, the framework organizes the compliance monitoring function into six interdependent layers: data ingestion and integration, feature engineering and entity resolution, a hybrid detection engine, explainability and risk scoring, human-in-the-loop review, and governance with continuous feedback. The framework treats detection accuracy and regulatory defensibility as joint design objectives rather than competing priorities, positioning explainability and human oversight as structural components rather than after-the-fact controls. The paper situates the framework against existing regulatory expectations, including the Federal Reserve's SR 11-7 model risk guidance and the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, discusses sector-specific extensions to digital assets, insurance, and cross-institutional consortia, illustrates the framework through a hypothetical high-volume payments scenario, and compares it against alternative approaches. It concludes by identifying the limitations of a purely conceptual contribution and outlining directions for empirical validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Ominyi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: