Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We give a constructive analysis of Kochen–Specker (KS) contextuality at the level of complete orthogonal bases (contexts). In dimension three, three noncomputational mutually unbiased bases generate a union of 165 rays and 130 contexts. Exact provenance accounting gives a symmetric decomposition: the three 69-ray lineages share 21 rays and 10 contexts, while each contributes 48 exclusive rays and 40 lineage-specific contexts. Each 69-ray, 50-context lineage is a KS configuration, and this framework clarifies the relation among the Yu–Oh, Harding–Salinas Schmeis, and Cabello constructions. In dimensions four and five, we give parametrized orthogonality gadgets whose connector contexts force a central ray to be maximally unbiased relative to the computational basis. For the concrete four-dimensional example, the 20-ray gadget and the Cabello 18-ray set are informationally equivalent subsets of the 24-ray Peres–Mermin eigensystem, although their context hypergraphs have different two-valued-state behavior. The results show why both the rays and the complete incidence structure of their contexts are needed in assessments of KS contextuality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: