Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Free-space links free a clock comparison from fibre geography, at the price of geometric loss and atmospheric variability. A credible design must show received power, photon rate and timing jitter together, because a link that closes in power can still fail in timing precision. This paper sizes a ground-station laser time-transfer terminal with stated apertures and transmit power, propagates the geometric loss over an eight-hundred-kilometre path, and converts the resulting timing jitter into a range and potential equivalent. The computed results, taken from the deposited script, are as follows in summary: The computed received_power_W is 0.000122. The computed photon_rate_per_s is 9.51e+14. The computed timing_jitter_ps is 10. The computed one_way_range_equiv_m is 0.003. The computed link_margin_note is geometric. The study is a computation from stated assumptions, not a measurement, and its figures should be read at the precision those assumptions support. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: