Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Automated health status assessment of complex combustion systems—such as fluidised bed combustion in power plant applications—faces three persistent challenges: dependence on domain expertise, scarcity of empirical data on rare accident scenarios, and the prohibitive high-fidelity simulation costs. We propose a framework that integrates domain-grounded large language models, high-fidelity simulations, data-driven reduced-order models, and machine learning for computationally efficient, simulation-based health status assessment. The large language model synthesises failure scenarios and translates failure descriptions into simulation parameters. We construct a reduced-order model via operator inference to reduce the computational costs by 99.74% over the same 0–15 s time horizon and train an extreme gradient boosting classifier to effectively categorise fault signatures and differentiate between faulty and nominal operational states. All reduced-order model trajectories remained numerically stable up to 30 s, and the classifier achieved an accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score of 1.0 in both clean on-grid and independent off-grid validation subjected to mild noise conditions. The framework automates the workflow from scenario generation to simulation-based health status assessment, supporting more efficient exploration of rare fault conditions in digital twin applications. These results demonstrate feasibility within the reduced, sensitivity-guided operating envelope considered in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: