Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Post-polypectomy surveillance is anchored to polyp size, with a 10-mm cut-off separating a return to screening from 3-year follow-up and a 5-mm cut-off defining the diminutive category. For most polyps the only numerical size record available to the clinician is the pathologist’s post-fixation measurement, yet whether formalin fixation shifts lesions across these thresholds is disputed. Methods Colorectal polyps ≥ 5 mm removed by snare polypectomy during routine colonoscopy and retrieved intact were measured fresh by the endoscopist and again after 8–24 h in 10% neutral buffered formalin by a blinded pathologist, using identical millimetric rulers. Comparative analyses were restricted to neoplastic lesions; unaided in-vivo visual assessments were examined descriptively. Results Sixty-three polyps from 53 patients were analysed; 55 (87.3%) were neoplastic. Mean size fell from 10.09 to 8.98 mm (reduction 1.11 mm, 95% CI 0.86–1.36; 13.7% per lesion; p < 0.001); 67.3% shrank and none enlarged. Shrinkage was greater in lesions < 10 mm than ≥ 10 mm (18.3% vs. 8.3%; p = 0.005) and in sessile than pedunculated lesions (17.3% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.008). Four of the eight lesions measuring 10–11 mm when fresh fell below 10 mm, and the number classified as diminutive rose from 7 to 15. In-vivo assessment showed wider dispersion and twice the threshold discordance. Conclusions Formalin fixation produces a small but directional size reduction that disproportionately affects small and sessile polyps and can shift lesions across both decision thresholds. Recording a fresh ex-vivo measurement at polypectomy is a simple, no-cost step that standardises the reference point.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karatas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: