Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: This is a scale-up report on the SMART (Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events) epilepsy self-management (ESM) program. METHODS: Engagement in SMART was assessed via session attendance (maximum of 8). Outcomes included the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10), Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Neurological DisordersDepression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) and past 30-day seizure frequency. RESULTS: 153 PWE were referred to ESM, mean age 37.6 (SD 12.8). Average attendance for PWE who attended ≥ 1 session (N = 115) was 5.8 (SD 2.6). There were no significant pre/post changes for QOLIE-10, NDDI-E, GAD-7, PHQ-9 or past 30-day seizure counts. Exploratory analysis of clinically relevant subgroups found PWE with PHQ-9 ≥ 10 at baseline (N = 27), had significant improvement pre/post SMART with means of 15.0 (SD 4.5) and 11.7 (SD 5.1), respectively (p = 0.001), those with GAD-7 ≥ 10 at baseline (N = 31) had significant improvement pre/post SMART with means of 14.4 (SD 3.2) and 11.2 (SD 3.8), respectively (p = 0.001) and those in the lowest quartile of QOLIE-10 scores (N = 16) had significant improvement pre/post SMART with means of 3.8 (SD 0.5) and 3.4 (SD 0.8), respectively. DISCUSSION: This analysis from a real-world, non-research study sample suggests scaling up ESM in an epilepsy-care clinical setting appears feasible, acceptable to PWE, and can improve outcomes for PWE with depression, anxiety and suboptimal quality of life. Future work needs to address barriers to generalizability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Granner et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: