Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Open-channel discharge measurement underpins irrigation scheduling, water allocation, and flood management decisions, yet contact-based techniques carry real operational risk at high flows and cannot support continuous automated monitoring. Field validation of the Farneback dense optical flow algorithm for non-contact discharge estimation was carried out at Dhayari canal, Pune, Maharashtra, India, with simultaneous measurements from a Vega C-21 radar Doppler sensor and an acoustic Doppler sensor serving as reference instruments. A Nikon 16 MP camera, mounted at a fixed overhead position, recorded canal flow at 24 fps across 17 measurement grids at 1.0 m intervals, covering the full 17.0 m top width of a trapezoidal section (bottom width 9.0 m, FSL 4.5 m, cross-sectional area 58.5 m2). Surface velocities were derived from consecutive frame pairs, scaled to mean velocity using the correction factor α = 0.85, and adjusted for flow direction through cosine correction. Grid-level discharge was computed and summed across all 17 sections, yielding QF = 14.219 m3/s, which sits between QR = 13.860 m3/s from radar and QA = 14.494 m3/s from acoustic sensor, at an overall accuracy of 97.54%. Camera-based optical flow matches instrument-grade discharge measurement without placing personnel or equipment at the water surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garimella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: