Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a recent article in this journal, James Hart argues against a dilemma posed by Joe Horton to views of limited aggregation. Hart argues that one horn is fatal but avoidable while the other horn is neither fatal nor avoidable. Moreover, he presents a principle of limited aggregation—Match by Closeness—that supposedly avoids the fatal horn. However, as I show in this article, Match by Closeness does not avoid the fatal horn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David Lindqvist (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: