Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chronic reproductive pain often remains invisible within public health systems that prioritize demographic targets and short-term clinical outcomes over women’s long-term well-being. This article examines how testimonial narratives reveal structural dimensions of reproductive suffering obscured in institutional health records. Drawing on a narrative documented in the People’s Archive of Rural India, it analyzes a woman’s prolonged reproductive pain following the nonconsensual insertion of a postpartum intrauterine device (IUD). Employing qualitative narrative analysis informed by feminist medical humanities, chronic illness studies, and phenomenology, the article conceptualizes reproductive pain as slow violence produced through institutional neglect, coercive family planning, and diagnostic dismissal. It argues for recognizing women’s testimonies as critical epistemic resources in reproductive healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pallavi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: