Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cassava (Manihot esculenta) is a key staple crop supporting global food security, yet its productivity is increasingly constrained by declining soil fertility and climate variability. In many cassava-producing regions, phosphorus (P) recommendations rely on static fertilization grids that do not adequately account for site-specific soil and crop response variability. This study evaluates a dynamic P prescription framework for cassava using a Random Forest (RF) model and compares its performance with a conventional three-step recommendation approach comprising calibration, site-specific optimization, and grid-based clustering. The analysis used an international dataset combining cassava yield response trials with soil and climatic variables, including PBray-1, soil organic matter (SOM), pHwater, and annual rainfall. Results showed that the traditional grid-based approach exhibited a weak correspondence between prescribed rates and site-specific economic optima. In contrast, the RF-based model achieved improved predictive performance, with R2 values of 0.74 for training and 0.59 for testing. The dynamic framework enabled reconstruction of site-specific P response curves by integrating multiple soil and climatic covariates. Overall, the results indicate that data-driven approaches can complement traditional P recommendation methods by better capturing inter-site variability and supporting more adaptive fertilization strategies for cassava production systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: