Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction To our knowledge, no previous study has directly compared the TGF-β1-related responses of human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) to conditioned media derived from A-PRF+, H-PRF, Gel A-PRF+, and e-PRF, with and without bone allograft. Aim To evaluate the TGF-β1-related cellular response of hDPSCs following exposure to conditioned media derived from different PRF preparations, used alone or combined with bone allograft. Materials and methods Four PRF preparations (A-PRF+, H-PRF, Gel A-PRF+, and e-PRF) were investigated with and without bone allograft. Each experimental group included 10 independent biological samples (n = 10). Conditioned media were collected after 24 h and on day 14. hDPSCs cultured in unconditioned medium served as controls. After 48 h of treatment, TGF-β1-related cellular immunoreactivity was assessed using Cell ELISA and normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Statistical analysis included the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc test and Bonferroni correction. Direct paired comparisons were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction. Results PRF preparations without allograft showed no significant increases in the normalized TGF-β1/GAPDH signal compared with controls. After 24 h of conditioning, significant increases were observed for H-PRF, Gel A-PRF+, and e-PRF combined with allograft compared with controls. After 14 days, significant increases were observed for Gel A-PRF+ and e-PRF with allograft. Direct paired comparisons demonstrated significantly higher signals for Gel A-PRF+ and e-PRF with allograft after 14 days compared with the corresponding preparations without allograft, whereas no significant differences were detected after 24 h. Conclusion The TGF-β1-related response of hDPSCs varied according to PRF preparation, allograft supplementation, and conditioning period. The significant effects observed for Gel A-PRF+ and e-PRF combined with allograft support further investigation of these constructs as potential bioactive materials for vital pulp therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vladova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: