Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The abundance of cosmic voids as a function of radius is computed in a cosmology whose earliest phase is a bounce bounded in density and shear, and the result is compared with the counts reported by published void catalogues. The bounce enters the calculation in one place only: the shear ceiling rescales the effective void-formation barrier at the largest radii, by a fractional amount of 0.018 in the linear amplitude, which translates into a suppression of the abundance that grows with radius. At a radius of 50 megaparsecs per h the predicted abundance ratio between the bounced and standard calculations is 0.960, and at 100 megaparsecs per h it is 0.921. The standard calculation gives 1.85e+04 voids per cubic gigaparsec per h at 30 megaparsecs per h at redshift zero, falling to 7.56e+03 at redshift one, and it matches the published catalogue densities used as anchors with a chi-squared of 3.34 for four anchor points at 25 per cent fractional tolerance. The headline finding is negative in a useful sense: the bounce correction is smaller than present catalogue uncertainties at every radius below 100 megaparsecs per h, so void counts in current surveys cannot yet distinguish the two histories, while a survey that halves the fractional error at the largest radii could. All values are computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: