Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey analyses discard small-scale shear data whose modelling they do not trust, at a calculable cost in information. Integrating the signal-to-noise of the convergence spectrum for a representative sample, this paper finds that multipoles below 300 carry a fraction 0.238 of the total squared signal-to-noise, below 1000 a fraction 0.763, and below 3000 a fraction 0.983, so the discarded high-multipole region holds a substantial share of the raw statistical power. The large-scale primordial suppression studied in this set, by contrast, produces a fractional spectrum change of 0.016 at multipole 100 and only 0.0002 at multipole 1000: its signature lives where the information is thinnest and the modelling is safest. Scale policy therefore cannot be set by information or by safety alone; it must be set by where the specific signal under test resides. All quantities are computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: