Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the Bruck–Bose representation in \(PG{(6,q)}\) of Baer subgeometries \(PG{(3,q)}\) of \(PG{(3,q²)}\) meeting the plane at infinity in a line \(PG{(1,q)}\). Unlike the canonical Baer subgeometry, whose representation is a linear \(3\)-space, a Baer subgeometry meeting the plane at infinity in a line cannot be represented by a linear \(3\)-space in \(PG{(6,q)}\). We construct a family of \(q + 1\) ruled cubic surfaces with a common affine conic and linear directrices forming a regulus of the Desarguesian spread. We prove that their union, together with the \(q + 1\) corresponding improper points, represents a Baer subgeometry \(PG{(3,q)}\) whose intersection with the plane at infinity is exactly a line \(PG{(1,q)}\). Moreover, the ruled cubic surfaces represent the \(q + 1\) Baer subplanes of a pencil of planes of this subgeometry, with the common affine conic representing their common affine line.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rita Vincenti (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: