Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This was aimed to produce and evaluate the nutrient, physical and organoleptic properties of wheat-unpeeled plantain composite flour bread fortified with prawn powder. The raw materials were procured at Relief Market, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria and unpeeled plantain and prawn were processed to flour/powder. The proximate composition of the bread samples had moisture content ranged from 38.77-41.27%, dry matter: 58.73-61.23%, ash: 2.19-2.61%, crude protein: 9.49-10.79%, crude fibre: 1.62-1.87%, fat: 9.27-15.27%, carbohydrate: 29.95-36.74% and energy value: 267.47-304.99 (kcal/100g). The mineral compositions had sodium: 168.41-184.78 mg/100 g, phosphorus: 123.63-136.77 mg/100 g, iron: 1.44-1.81 mg/100 g and magnesium: 75.38-89.66 mg/100 g. The physical properties had specific volume: 1.026-2.156 cm 3 /g, loaf volume: 300-600 cm 3 , loaf weight: 2726.92-3170.28 N, bread thickness: 39.37-55.69 mm, loaf length: 151.73-174.68, width: 80.79-87.60 mm, bread density: 0.46-0.97 g/cm 3 , bread mass: 278.07-323.28 g, crust colour: 1606-1783 pcu, spread ratio: 1.46-2.09, absorbance: 1.568-2.429, oven spring: 3.26-3.02 cm and baking loss: 8.00-11.04 g. The sensory result showed taste scores from 4.70-5.90, colour: 4.50-7.00, aroma: 5.10-5.90, texture: 5.60-6.80 and general acceptability: 5.10-6.30. The results collectively suggested that bread produced from 75% wheat flour, 20% unpeeled plantain flour, and 5% prawn powder provided the best balance between improved nutritional quality, retained minerals, desirable physical properties, and acceptable sensory attributes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chrystogonus et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: