Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strong gravitational lens time delays measure a combination of angular diameter distances to the lens, to the source, and between them, and that combination samples intermediate redshifts where a bounce correction is partly switched on. For a representative lens at redshift 0.5 with a source at redshift 2.0, the time-delay distance changes by 0.20 percent at epsilon = 0.10; across a grid of lens and source redshifts it ranges from 0.11 to 0.24 percent. Published time-delay analyses quote per-lens precisions near 5 percent and combined expansion-rate uncertainties near 2 percent, centred in the low seventies. Matching the computed shift to the combined precision gives a tolerance amplitude of epsilon = 5.350. Time-delay cosmography is therefore moderately frame-sensitive: it cannot be ported into a bounced cosmology at face value, but recomputed it becomes an independent intermediate-redshift witness with leverage the local rungs lack. This study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: