Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) is a key technology for carbon neutrality, but conventional CO2 geological sequestration suffers from high injection pressure, limited stability, and restricted storage space. Hydrate-based CO2 sequestration offers high capacity, low cost, and intrinsic safety. This study proposes a novel in situ CO2 hydrate formation and sequestration method in coal mine goafs containing permafrost layers in cold regions. The natural low-temperature permafrost environment provides favorable conditions for hydrate formation, while goafs offer large storage space. To avoid hydrate plugging and improve engineering feasibility, a liquid-first CO2 constant-pressure supply and predissolution mode was adopted. We simulated goaf conditions at depths of 110–130 m and ∼1 MPa. Experiments tested three injection temperatures (293.15, 298.15, and 303.15 K) and five goaf temperatures (269.15–277.15 K) using tetrahydrofuran and tryptophan as promoters. Results proved efficient sequestration at a low pressure of 1 MPa. Under optimal conditions (injection temperature of 298.15 K, goaf temperature of 271.15 K), capacity reached 60.9 mmol of CO2/mol of water (mmol/mol) with an efficiency of 135.36 (kg·m–3)/MPa. The 26.7 h stability experiments under depressurization showed 4.21–16.09 mmol/mol dissociated initially, but 66.38%–90.77% CO2 remained sequestered. Further, one-month tests under the pressure-release condition revealed hydrate dissociation almost stopped after day 1, yielding a 65.32% permanent sequestration ratio. Crucially, under the pressure-maintained condition, the system continued to form CO2 hydrates over the 30-day period, resulting in an additional 31.04% CO2 storage. These results validate the feasibility and long-term stability of this novel approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: