Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research focuses on how two terms used to refer to migrants and their children in the Netherlands, allochtoon and migratieachtergrond , participate in discourses of migration. The data analyzed are from Dutch national newspapers and Dutch-language X from 2005 to 2023. For both terms, over time and across platforms, the dominant discourse is an Othering discourse, which positions people of migration background as intrinsically different from the majority and often a negative factor in Dutch society. The analysis focuses on the characteristics attributed to people referred to with these terms, and how this in turn constructs national identity. The imagined non-migration background majority is constructed as the legitimate keeper of the culture, hard-working and tolerant, and potentially under threat from migration. Despite a counter discourse which notes social exclusion of people of migration background, the migration discourses overwhelmingly serve to appeal to the affective comfort of the majority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janet M. Fuller (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: