Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article seeks to problematize the concept of ontology to which Gilles Deleuze’s thought is commonly ascribed. To this end, two main premises will be articulated: on the one hand, the impossibility of exposing or representing his work, that is, of making it prefigure as a theoretical corpus already given for academic interpretation; on the other, the relational and performative character that runs through it from beginning to end and that blocks any access in the canonical terms of ‘truth.’ In this sense, Deleuze’s thought seems to give rise to a pragmatic and micropolitical impulse whose trail could only be ‘followed’ in a kind of happy blindness. It is within the framework of an affect, in the very experience of a mosaic of forces coming together in an encounter with it, that this disorientation comes to orient itself according to sudden and ever-new coordinates. Finally, and in light of this premise, we propose to trace a possible alliance between the ontological postulate of the univocity of being and perspectivist practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elías Manzano Corona (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: