Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper computes, from stated assumptions and published representative values, the quantity at the heart of the following question: how large the dissipation of atmospheric kinetic energy is compared with the sunlight that ultimately sustains it. The headline computed values are: area m2 = 5.1e+14, dissipation W m2 = 2, total dissipation TW = 1.02e+03, absorbed W m2 = 240, fraction of absorbed = 0.00833. The approach is compute Lorenz-cycle dissipation ~2 W/m2 over Earth area, total TW, fraction of absorbed solar, vacuum-energy equivalent volume, carried through in full in the deposited computation script so that every number in the text can be reproduced directly. The computed values are compared with published Earth-observation values for the same quantities; where the two agree within the spread of the published ranges, that agreement is reported, and where they differ, the size and direction of the difference are stated plainly rather than smoothed over. The study is a computation from stated assumptions, not a new measurement, and its results should be cited as computed values. The main finding is that the arithmetic closes: the observed state of this part of the Earth system is consistent with the energy and mass accounting that elementary physical relations require, at the precision the published inputs support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: