Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Decentralized cyber–physical systems (CPSs) improve scalability and fault tolerance but expose local controllers and neighbor-to-neighbor coordination to integrity, availability, and multi-agent attacks. This study presents a PRISMA-guided systematic mapping of cyber-resilience methods for decentralized CPSs and integrates the evidence into a taxonomy and assessment framework. A Scopus search exported on 14 September 2026 yielded 366 records; 337 primary records were screened, 163 underwent eligibility assessment, 79 were included, and 72 met a six-criterion quality threshold for Core synthesis. Power systems and microgrids represented 55.6% of Core studies, false-data/deception attacks were the largest primary attack family (31.9%), and only 18.1% evaluated explicit multi-vector or hybrid attacks. Simulation-only validation dominated (70.8%), while 29.2% provided strong experimental, real-time, hardware-in-the-loop, laboratory, or co-simulation evidence. The synthesis shows comparatively mature work on resilient control, detection, observer-based compensation, and consensus but limited evidence on recovery, self-healing, safety preservation, cross-domain transfer, and reproducible multi-vector evaluation. The proposed framework connects attack models, topology assumptions, resilience mechanisms, validation strength, and measurable outcomes, providing a traceable basis for comparing methods and designing stronger future evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sagindykov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: