Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Whole-Region Comprehensive Land Consolidation (WRCLC) faces persistent evaluation bottlenecks in practice: traditional quantitative monitoring captures physical land-cover changes but fails to interpret cross-sectoral policy semantics, whereas manual administrative review suffers from high operational costs, subjective inconsistency, and severe information asymmetry. To address these challenges, this study develops a domain-adapted Large Language Model (LLM) framework for structured preliminary effectiveness assessment of WRCLC, using Guangdong Province as a case study. Following the standardization and integration of multi-source heterogeneous data across county-level units, a domain-specific model is established using a knowledge distillation framework based on a hard-constraint mechanism combined with LoRA fine-tuning. A six-dimensional evaluation system is established to evaluate project progress, factor endowment guarantee, structural optimization, value realization, bottom-line constraints, and regional characteristics. Qualitative and quantitative validation across typical county-level administrative divisions in Guangdong demonstrates high alignment with expert judgment and robust capabilities in contextual narrative generation. Rather than replacing administrative decision-making or expert review, this framework demonstrates the feasibility of generative artificial intelligence as an auxiliary decision-support tool. Operating within a human-in-the-loop governance paradigm, the proposed approach effectively bridges quantitative spatial metrics and qualitative governance semantics, significantly reducing administrative drafting burdens while enhancing process monitoring, compliance review, and adaptive land governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: