Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable online sleep monitoring requires sleep-stage estimates and forecasts based only on information available at the time of prediction. This study developed a temporally causal two-layer framework for wearable electroencephalography (EEG) sleep staging and short-horizon sleep-transition forecasting. Using 128 Bitbrain Open Access Sleep (BOAS) recordings from 100 participants, the first layer (M0) performed five-stage sleep classification with causal signal processing and participant-isolated nested validation. The second layer (M1) used strictly cross-fitted histories of M0 stage probabilities to predict transitions from wake or N1 (W/N1) to N2, N3, or REM sleep (N2+) within 60, 90, or 120 s after each observed 30-s epoch. M1 eligibility was determined from M0-predicted stages during training and evaluation, without requiring polysomnography (PSG) stage labels at inference. M0 achieved 0.830 accuracy and 0.704 macro-F1. Under M0-predicted eligibility, M1 achieved AUROC values of 0.801, 0.791, and 0.786 at 60, 90, and 120 s, respectively; complementary PSG-conditioned evaluation yielded 0.814, 0.803, and 0.801. Prediction was stronger during wakefulness than N1, and the benefits of probability history were specific to the future-sleep task. Future-perturbation tests confirmed unchanged pre-boundary outputs under the tested conditions. A frozen M0 replay on three Muse S Gen2 nights further identified stage-specific limitations in cross-device transfer. These findings establish an auditable framework for temporally causal wearable EEG analysis and demonstrate the potential of short-horizon sleep-transition forecasting while identifying its current generalization boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: