Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Loss of the tumour suppressor PTEN activates PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling and is linked to aggressive prostate cancer. Data from transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) specimens are limited. Aim: To assess PTEN expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in prostatic carcinoma and correlate it with clinicopathological parameters. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five TURP specimens with histologically confirmed prostatic carcinoma were studied (January 2024-April 2026). Tumours were graded by the Gleason system and ISUP grade group (GG). PTEN IHC was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections; loss was defined as complete absence of tumour-cell staining with preserved internal controls. Associations were tested by Fisher's exact test. Results: Patients were aged 54-86 years (mean 71.7 ± 8.5). There were 11 low-grade (GG 1-3) and 11 high-grade (GG 4-5) adenocarcinomas, one case of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and two metastatic deposits (ungraded). PTEN loss was seen in 10 cases (40%). It occurred in 4 of 11 low-grade (36.4%) and 6 of 11 high-grade tumours (54.5%) (p = 0.67). Perineural and lymphovascular invasion were present in 28% and 8% of cases, without significant association with PTEN status. Conclusion: PTEN loss is common in TURP-detected prostatic carcinoma and shows a non-significant trend towards higher grade, with loss also seen in some low-grade tumours. PTEN IHC is an inexpensive adjunct worth testing in larger studies with outcome data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamaldeep et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: