Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates how Game-24-based learning fosters mathematical creative thinking among lower secondary students in integer operations. Although game-based learning has been widely recognized for improving engagement and academic performance, limited research has explored the cognitive mechanisms through which mathematical creativity develops during game-based mathematics instruction, particularly in lower secondary contexts. The study employed a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design to examine the progression of students’ creative thinking through the dimensions of fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The qualitative phase involved in-depth analysis of students’ problem-solving processes through observations, written tasks, and interviews, while the quantitative phase utilized a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design involving Grade 7 students. Inferential statistical analysis revealed that the instructional impact of Game-24 did not emerge immediately during the initial adaptation phase (t = 0.47, p = 0.642), but became highly significant after sustained implementation (t = -8.38, p < 0.001). Qualitative findings demonstrated that students progressively shifted from rigid procedural strategies toward adaptive and reflective problem-solving behaviors. High-ability students exhibited stronger metacognitive regulation, whereas moderate- and low-ability students showed substantial gains in strategic exploration and idea generation. The findings suggest that Game-24 functions as a cognitive scaffold that promotes strategic experimentation, cognitive flexibility, and metacognitive reflection in mathematics learning. This study contributes to the growing discourse on game-based and technology-enhanced learning by providing empirical evidence that mathematical creativity develops cumulatively through sustained interactive learning experiences. The results offer important pedagogical implications for designing adaptive and creativity-oriented mathematics instruction in lower secondary education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: