Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a multifactorial and often underdiagnosed musculoskeletal disorder associated with substantial pain and disability. This study evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided dry needling (US-guided DN) on pain intensity, pressure pain threshold (PPT), and disability in patients with GTPS. Methods: This participant- and assessor-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial randomized 50 patients with GTPS (25 per group), of whom 46 completed the study (intervention n = 24; sham n = 22). Participants received three weekly sessions of either real or sham US-guided DN, along with a standardized home exercise program. The primary outcome was activity-related pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included PPT assessed at four anatomical sites and functional disability assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Results: Pain intensity and functional disability decreased over time in both groups, without evidence of superior outcomes following active dry needling. For the primary outcome (VAS), the estimated between-group difference at the final assessment was 0.50 points (95% CI: −0.44 to 1.43; p = 0.301). No significant overall group × time interactions were observed for PPT at any of the four anatomical sites. However, exploratory baseline-adjusted analyses identified significantly higher PPT values at the final assessment in the intervention group at the gluteal region and iliotibial band after Holm correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: US-guided DN did not demonstrate superior short-term improvements in pain intensity or disability compared with sham needling in patients with GTPS. Exploratory findings of higher baseline-adjusted PPT values at selected anatomical sites suggest possible localized differences in mechanical pain sensitivity. However, these findings do not establish a definitive treatment-specific hypoalgesic effect, and their clinical relevance remains uncertain. Trial Registration: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Kutahya Health Sciences University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2023-09/04). The trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06241872).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gökpınar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: