Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound attenuation imaging (USAT) in detecting and grading hepatosteatosis in obese pediatric patients, and to compare its findings with conventional B-mode ultrasonography and relevant laboratory parameters. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled 95 obese or morbidly obese children aged 8 to 18 years who presented to a pediatric endocrinology clinic with a preliminary diagnosis of hepatosteatosis. All patients underwent both B-mode ultrasonography and USAT using the Mindray Resona9 device. Hepatosteatosis was graded using device-specific attenuation cutoff values for USAT and standard echogenicity-based criteria for B-mode ultrasonography. Laboratory parameters, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT), triglycerides (TG), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: USAT identified hepatosteatosis in 70 of 95 patients (73.7%), whereas B-mode ultrasonography detected steatosis in only 36 of 95 (37.9%). Among the 59 patients classified as steatosis-free by B-mode ultrasonography, USAT identified steatosis in 36 (61%; P<0.001). Interobserver agreement was excellent for USAT (ICC=0.939; 95% CI: 0.903-0.962) and substantial for B-mode ultrasonography (weighted kappa=0.793). Patients who were USAT-positive but B-mode-negative demonstrated significantly higher ALT and HOMA-IR values, as well as a greater prevalence of hepatomegaly (P<0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: USAT is capable of detecting low-grade hepatic steatosis in obese children more effectively than conventional B-mode ultrasonography and shows significant correlations with key metabolic laboratory parameters. Given its objectivity, excellent reproducibility, and practical ease of use, routine incorporation of USAT alongside B-mode ultrasonography is warranted in the evaluation of hepatic steatosis in the pediatric population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özdemir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: