Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background We assessed SIGLEC1 , encoding CD169, as a candidate marker of myeloid remodeling in recurrent glioblastoma. Methods Patient-level analyses combined discovery single-nucleus data, three paired tissue cohorts, GSE174554 and CARE nuclear data, and unpaired CGGA693/325 tissue comparisons. Original discovery labels were benchmarked; fixed-program, reference-gene and longitudinal sensitivities were assessed. Results Tissue SIGLEC1 increased in 9/11, 12/13 and 11/17 patients in the original paired cohorts (Benjamini–Hochberg [BH] q = 0.0122, 0.00407 and 0.0322). CGGA693 showed higher recurrent-tissue expression (108 primary, 79 recurrent; difference 0.745 log2[FPKM + 1], 95% CI 0.133–1.277; q = 0.000586). Reference-adjusted contrasts and CGGA325 did not replicate that association. Original discovery labels matched 62.4% of reconstructed nuclei, with clean-myeloid F1 = 0.967. Reconstructed discovery expression differed by 0.088 ln units (95% CI − 0.715 to 0.530; P = 0.855); original-label, GSE174554 and CARE recurrence tests were nonsignificant. CARE depth-adjusted interferon correlations were positive at both stages (median rho = 0.200/0.199; n = 51/54; q = 3.48 × 10 −9 /9.75 × 10 −10 ), consistent with GSE174554. Paired association changes did not establish recurrence specificity. Conclusions Tissue associations and replicated myeloid interferon correlations support a context-dependent candidate marker hypothesis. Consistent longitudinal induction and clinical biomarker performance remain unconfirmed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: