Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the clinical feasibility of 68 Ga-nitroimidazole-FAPI (NI-FAPI), targeting both hypoxia and fibroblast activation protein (FAP), in gastrointestinal tumors compared with 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Methods: Thirty-two patients with gastrointestinal tumors (21 for initial staging, 11 for restaging) underwent both 68 Ga-NI-FAPI and 18 F-FDG PET/CT within 1 week. Immunohistochemistry for FAP and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) was performed. Semiquantitative parameters including SUV max , TBR, MTV, and total lesion FAP expression/glycolysis (TLF/TLG) were compared. Correlations between SUV max and primary tumor depth, the short diameter of involved lymph nodes, and liver metastases were analyzed. Results: Immunohistochemistry confirmed FAP expression on cancer-associated fibroblasts and HIF-1α in tumor cytoplasm. 68 Ga-NI-FAPI upgraded initial staging in 2 patients (9.52%). Among recurrent patients, its true positive rate was 100% versus 70% for 18 F-FDG. 68 Ga-NI-FAPI PET/CT demonstrated higher SUV max and TBR in primary tumors (14.06±6.26 vs. 10.04±6.53, P =0.005; 12.30±6.80 vs. 6.52±4.38, P <0.001), particularly in signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC). It detected more metastases than 18 F-FDG (306 vs. 263, P =0.003), with higher SUV max and TBR in involved lymph nodes, liver metastases, peritoneal metastases, and other distant metastases (all P <0.05). SUV max of 68 Ga-NI-FAPI positively correlated with primary tumor depth ( r =0.528, P =0.003), the short diameter of involved lymph nodes ( r =0.304, P =0.032), and liver metastases ( r =0.349, P =0.040). Conclusion: 68 Ga-NI-FAPI exhibits superior diagnostic performance in gastrointestinal tumors compared with 18 F-FDG, particularly in staging, SRCC evaluation, and metastasis detection. The positive correlation between tumor size and uptake supports its potential for patient selection in ligand-directed radionuclide therapy, establishing it as an effective theranostic agent for gastrointestinal tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: