Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Understanding how historic urban morphology and atmospheric conditions shape the spatial and vertical distribution of traffic-related carbon monoxide (CO) remains challenging in intermediate cities of the Global South. This study examined CO distribution across three spatial scales in the Historic Center of Cuenca, Ecuador, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, integrating urban functional analysis, morphology, traffic-flow assessment, sensor monitoring (2025), and dispersion modeling (May 2025). The historic center concentrated 30% of non-residential land uses and 20% of traffic congestion; CO at a high-traffic station (9 m) was 2.4 times that at a lower-traffic station (20 m). Mean modeled CO at 1.5 m peaked at 0.52 mg/m3 during 07:00–08:00 h; for similar flows, it was five times higher than at 08:00–09:00 h. Modeled concentrations decreased by up to 66.7% between 1.5 and 9 m, with the largest decreases under stable morning and evening conditions; the model met urban acceptance criteria against multi-height measurements. These results suggest that traffic intensity alone does not explain CO concentrations in historic urban canyons: morphology and atmospheric stability are likely to jointly regulate pollutant accumulation and dispersion, underscoring the need to incorporate vertical air-pollution gradients into mobility planning and sensor siting in historic centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chica et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: