Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has emerged as a critical pillar of climate mitigation efforts, yet its scalable deployment is constrained by capital-intensive investments, regulatory fragmentation, and an absence of standardized site evaluation frameworks. This discussion paper advances a novel, decision-oriented methodology for pilot-scale CCS project appraisal, emphasizing the need to distinguish between commercialization and optimization pathways. By developing a systematic framework grounded in the capacity–injectivity–containment triad, and contextualized with metrics derived from analogous subsurface industries, the paper proposes a structured and defensible basis for model selection, site qualification, and early-phase feasibility assessment. The framework is tailored to support operators with limited financial resources by prioritizing small-scale, locally deployable projects and reducing epistemic uncertainty through explicit, objective-based parameterization. Through integrating reservoir characterization, performance metrics, and decision logic, this approach facilitates transparent project evaluation and risk management, ultimately promoting more confident, cost-effective CCS deployment while preserving environmental security and public trust.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Navaid et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: