Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
本文提出太极统一场论(TUFT),一种以东方阴阳哲学为组织框架、以系统功能视角重新诠释四种基本相互作用的结构模型。理论建立 A/B 双版场态体系:A 版为理想对称场(k²=1,k=±1),承担定性基准;B 版为现实破缺场(k_eff²=1+Δk),面向现实宇宙的演化刻画,二者通过量变质变规律实现衔接。模型引入独立 S 型过渡函数 s(σ) 描述场态切换的平滑形态,并构造有效算子 k_eff=(2s−1)√(1+Δk),实现过渡形态与映射算子的定义分离。在职能划分上,强核力主凝聚、弱核力主嬗变、引力承载时空基底,电磁相互作用对应的有效算子作为跨尺度中介,构成四力流转闭环。本文明确限定:所有哲学映射均为系统功能层面的诠释,不改动任何一力的标准定义与动力学方程;核心耦合式为结构示意式,不满足量纲齐次,不作为严格动力学方程。理论给出三条可核验推论,为其提供证伪途径。本理论不依赖高能对称同源路径,而是在功能与拓扑层面完成宏观引力与微观核力的关联示意(功能层面,非本体统一)。 Abstract This paper proposes the Taiji Unified Field Theory (TUFT), a structural model that reinterprets the four fundamental interactions from a systems-functional perspective, organized by the Eastern yin-yang framework. The theory establishes an A/B dual field-state system: Version A is the ideal symmetric field (k²=1, k=±1) serving as a qualitative benchmark; Version B is the realistic symmetry-breaking field (k_eff²=1+Δk) describing the evolution of the actual universe, with the two connected through the law of quantitative-to-qualitative change. An independent S-shaped transition function s(σ) is introduced to describe the smooth switching of field states, and the effective operator k_eff=(2s−1)√(1+Δk) is constructed to separate the transition profile from the mapping operator. Functionally, the strong interaction governs condensation, the weak interaction governs transmutation, gravity bears the spacetime substrate, and the operator corresponding to the electromagnetic interaction serves as a cross-scale mediator, forming a closed loop among the four interactions. This paper explicitly limits all philosophical mappings to the functional level, without altering the standard definitions or dynamical equations of any interaction. The core coupling equation is a structural schematic, not dimensionally homogeneous, and is not a rigorous dynamical equation. Three testable inferences are provided as falsification routes. The theory does not rely on high-energy symmetry-breaking-from-a-common-origin paths, but completes a functional and topological correlation between macroscopic gravity and microscopic nuclear forces (at the functional level, not ontological unification).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hechun Sun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: