Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed training may serve as a tool to mitigate injury risk by reducing lower-limb asymmetries, enhancing neuromuscular control, and optimizing landing biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of mixed training on unilateral lower-limb stiffness (LLS) and the landing error scoring system (LESS) as biomechanical risk proxies associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Thirty-two trained youth male basketball athletes were randomly assigned to a French contrast, a contrast, or a complex training protocol in a six-week mesocycle with a training frequency of twice per week. All groups performed pre‐ and post‐training intervention measurements of unilateral drop jump stiffness and the bilateral drop jump LESS. Two-way ANOVAs revealed significant interaction effects between the round and the protocol for non-dominant LLS (p = 0.03) and the LESS (p = 0.003). Athletes experienced significant and pronounced improvements in non-dominant LLS and the LESS following complex (LLS: p = 0.0008, d = 1.30; LESS: p = 0.005, d = 1.41) and contrast (LLS: p = 0.017, d = 1.10; LESS: p = 0.007, d = 1.35), but not French contrast training strategies. Linear regression showed significance (p = 0.009), with changes in non-dominant LLS accounting for 21% of the variance in LESS changes. Our findings demonstrate the effectiveness of both complex and contrast training as an indirect ACL injury risk minimization tool via improvements in non-dominant LLS and the LESS. Such improvements may be attributed to post-intervention neuromuscular adaptations, including greater higher-threshold motor unit recruitment, rate coding, and synchronization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liosis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: