Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computer access can be difficult for people who cannot use conventional mouse-and-keyboard input effectively. This study documents the design of a rule-based multimodal computer-access prototype comprising a Turkish voice-command module and a face/head-motion cursor-control module, and reports a preliminary usability evaluation limited to the voice-command component. Before development, formative consultations were conducted with two individuals with upper-limb impairments, one individual with a visual impairment, and six non-disabled stakeholders. After development, 25 non-disabled proxy participants completed a predefined scenario of 19 common computer tasks using the Turkish voice-command module. Task completion, completion time, facilitator assistance, and descriptive post-scenario feedback were recorded. All participants reached the predefined outcome for every task within an assisted protocol. Facilitator assistance was required in 28 task-participant instances across six tasks, most frequently when copying selected text, selecting a search-result link, and creating a new file. Mean task-completion times ranged from 9 to 240 seconds. The observations point to command operations and workflow transitions that may warrant further refinement, including clearer feedback, more visible error recovery, simplified multi-step interactions, and greater personalisation. However, the evaluation did not include participants with upper-limb impairments, did not test the face/head-motion module, and did not use standardised usability, workload, or cognitive-load measures. The results therefore offer preliminary proxy-user observations about the Turkish voice-command module rather than validation of the complete multimodal system or its accessibility for the intended user population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KELEŞ et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: