Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Accurate state-of-charge (SOC) correction using open-circuit-voltage (OCV)–SOC tables is challenging under post-discharge small-charge conditions because the OCV characteristics of lithium-ion batteries depend on their charge–discharge history. This study proposes a regression-based method that predicts the SOC errors associated with the charging and discharging OCV–SOC tables and selects the table with the smaller predicted absolute error. Experiments at 25 °C used 21700 cells under 60 conditions varying preceding discharge C-rate, SOC, pre-charge rest time, and small-charge C-rate. Linear, reduced second-order polynomial, and SOC piecewise-linear models were compared; the piecewise-linear models were selected and integrated into a Coulomb-counting SOC correction algorithm. Independent validation comprised 15 new profiles: 13 at original factor levels and two under intermediate 0.35C discharge and 90 min pre-charge rest conditions. Predicted and measured selections agreed for all 15 profiles. For six profiles where the proposed and last-current-direction-based methods selected different tables, mean absolute SOC error decreased from 1.732% to 0.657% (62.1%); across all 15 profiles, it decreased from 1.169% to 0.739% (36.8%). Selections also agreed for all 10 dynamic discharge profiles. At 30–120 min post-charge rest, the proposed method yielded mean absolute errors of 0.648–0.662%, 45.3–45.8% below the last-current-direction baseline, demonstrating that performance was maintained with shorter rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyunchul Song (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: