Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), commonly known as secondhand smoke, and gastric cancer (GC) risk, and the findings have been inconsistent. We conducted a pooled analysis from StoP Project and a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the potential impact of ETS exposure on GC risk. METHODS: Five case-control studies with ETS information from the StoP project were included (1,560 GC cases and 2,497 controls). Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression models, adjusting for potential confounders. Pooled effect estimates were computed using random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using I2 (%) statistics. A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted including the StoP project and published studies (n=14), with publication bias assed via funnel plot and Egger's test. RESULTS: Study-specific estimates were heterogeneous, with stronger associations observed among never-smokers. A strong positive association was observed in the Iran study (aOR = 2.38; 95%CI: 1.11, 5.09) among never-smokers. ETS exposure was not associated with GC risk in the pooled StoP analysis. In the comprehensive meta-analysis, the H. pylori-adjusted subgroup showed a positive association (aOR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.21-1.64). The overall aOR was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.98-1.59, I2 = 69.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that ETS could be a risk factor for GC, underscoring the importance of targeted preventive measures and public health policies to reduce ETS exposure. IMPACT: This study provides the most comprehensive evaluation to date of ETS exposure and highlights ETS as a preventable GC risk factor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: