Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nitrogen (N) management remains a critical agronomic challenge due to various losses such as leaching and volatilisation which necessitate more efficient delivery mechanisms especially in acidic soils. This study investigated the N substitution potential of nano-urea in maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated under acidic soil conditions. A field experiment was conducted using a randomised complete block design with 12 treatments which compared varying levels 0 %, 50 %, 75 % and 100 % of the recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) applied either alone or in combination with foliar sprays of nano-urea or 2 % conventional prilled urea solution. Growth kinetics revealed that the combined application of 100 % RDN with nano-urea consistently maximised crop growth rate, net assimilation rate and leaf area duration. Importantly, reducing the basal N dose to 75 % RDN while supplementing with foliar nano-urea produced physiological responses and grain yield (5.79 t ha-1) which was statistically comparable to the 100 % RDN (6.24 t ha-1). This demonstrates a 25 % RDN substitution without incurring agronomic penalties. Furthermore, this 25 % N substitution approach optimised nitrogen use efficiency (NUE); the agronomic efficiency (AE) and apparent recovery efficiency (RE) of the 75 % RDN plus nano-urea treatment remained statistically comparable to the 100 % RDN. Pearson’s correlation analysis confirms that the enhancement of growth kinetics through nano-urea directly translated into improved sink capacity and final grain yield. In contrast, conventional 2 % prilled urea sprays showed high variability and failed to provide statistically at par results. Economic analysis indicated that the 75 % RDN plus nano-urea strategy maintained net returns and a benefit-cost (B:C) ratio statistically at par to the 100 % RDN. These findings suggest that integrating foliar nano-urea with reduced N applications represents an efficient and sustainable nutrient management strategy for maize in acidic soils, reducing the economic burden and environmental footprint of excessive soil N applications while sustaining overall profitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Satyam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: