Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Earlier papers derived mass (From Energy to Mass, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22042755), motion from center of mass (COM) shifts when energy overlaps (From Energy to Motion, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23441924), and angular momentum from the R/c lag (From Energy to Angular Momentum, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24125261). Here those two mechanisms alone, COM shifts and R/c lag, build an atom. Three organizational levels share one density function, ρ(r)/ρ₀ = 1 + cos(kπr³), with k = 1, 2, and 3 at correspondingly scaled radii. In a computational engine with nothing else in it, no conservation rules and no stability aids, eleven spheres self-assemble into a nested, breathing structure that holds through a 30,000-step run. Electrons emerge as high-density nodes where k=3 spheres overlap, not as particles: six for four spheres in a tetrahedral arrangement, moving as the spheres breathe, and fading and reforming as the overlaps shift. The k=2 nuclear group presents the opposite character, with low-density lacunae where its spheres' low-density bands coincide. The k=1 quarks sit in the densest junction of the whole group, in elongated triangles that crab-walk, and they can lead the atom's changes of direction. Group sizes are limited by the mechanism itself: density piles up as spheres join, until bursts eject the excess. Testing values showed groups hold at 3 or 4 for k=1, 6 (occasionally 7) for k=2, and 12 (rarely 13) for k=3. Grouping, exclusion, and hierarchical nesting all emerge without fine-tuning of absolute parameter values. The engine and analysis tools are available on request.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrew Firestone (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: