Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-horizon ecological model predictive control (Eco-MPC) coordinates energy use and car-following performance for battery electric vehicles (BEVs), whereas a destination-reserve target imposes a trip-level energy requirement. This paper proposes a destination-reserve-aware Eco-MPC that feeds remaining-trip energy adequacy into short-horizon car-following control through an outer supervisor. The supervisor blends prior and observed energy intensity to estimate remaining demand and activates a distance-indexed net-energy budget under reserve risk. A bounded energy account carries short-term budget deviations across updates. SUMO experiments include deterministic mechanism and remaining-demandestimation sensitivity analyses and paired held-out stochastic comparisons with fixed-weight and reserve-triggered adaptive-weight Eco-MPCs. At the lowest tested initial-energy level, deterministic trip energy decreased by 5.0% with a 1.2-s trip-time increase, improving the terminal reserve margin from -38.7 to -0.32 Wh. At the same initial-energy level, across three stochastic traffic conditions, mean terminal reserve margin increased by 27.2–45.5 Wh relative to fixed-weight control. Energy intensity decreased by 5.0–8.3 Wh/km, while trip time increased by 3.7–5.6 s. Relative to the specified adaptive-weight comparator, mean energy intensity decreased by 2.0–4.2 Wh/km and trip time shortened by 1.9–3.1 s. Controller differences generally diminished as initial energy increased, indicating that the proposed reserve regulation responds to the level of available trip energy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: