Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ferredoxins are ancient electron-transfer proteins containing two [4Fe–4 S] clusters that mediate electron transfer. While these clusters share a conserved structural framework, the extent to which their homologous cluster-binding environments exhibit coordinated evolutionary patterns remains unclear. Here, we performed a combined phylogenetic and sequence-based analysis of 250 bacterial dicluster 2[4Fe–4 S] ferredoxins. Phylogenetic analyses resolved four major clades, and correlations between the homologous cluster-binding environments of Cluster I and Cluster II differed among these lineages. The strongest coordinated sequence-level relationships were observed in simple ferredoxins from Clostridia , whereas weaker correlations were observed in insertion-bearing ferredoxins. Evolutionary conservation was further examined using the previously described TOTEMS framework (Fajardo et al. 2026), which demonstrated similar position-specific conservation patterns between the homologous cluster-binding environments of Cluster I and Cluster II. These findings are consistent with parallel sequence evolution around the two redox sites, suggesting that the homologous cluster-binding environments have evolved in a coordinated manner. Together, these results identify coordinated evolutionary patterns between homologous cluster-binding environments and provide a comparative framework for investigating sequence-level organization within bacterial dicluster ferredoxins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fajardo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: